Archive for the ‘Security Deposits’ Category

Defining Damages To Deduct From The Security Deposit

Monday, July 12th, 2010

Traditionally, security deposits are funds reserved for repairs beyond “normal wear and tear”.  This common language is defined by our own perspectives in the way we keep our personal homes, versus what courts of law are going to typically find worthy of a security deposit deduction.  So, sometimes what an owner finds to be a security deposit deduction item is based on personal standards that in a court of law would be found to be actual normal wear and tear.

Security deposit funds are reserved for damages caused by a tenant, whether accidental or intentional.  The fine line is the one between normal wear and tear that even the most careful tenant could incur on a property, and that which would be considered excessive.  The degree of soiling and wear on floor coverings often comes to mind.  Carpets, in particular, show the degree of wear when the furniture that was sitting on top of them are removed.  If a normal carpet cleaning brings the carpets back to life, this would be considered normal wear and tear.  If a large stain takes a $100 extra charge to be removed, or can’t be removed at all, this would be considered excessive and worthy of a deduction to the security deposit to pay for the eventual repair.

A couple of other common areas of confusion.  Paint will incur scuffs and dings in normal living.  Small holes for wall hangings are also to be expected.  Excessive amounts of either (drywall damage or large mollys pounded into the drywall every five feet) would likely be considered damage.

As I have stated in other posts, we mitigate the relative amount of change to a unit with a before and after walk-through to include pictures.  This allows us the greatest leverage if a security deposit deduction is required.  For more information, here is a link to a table posted at WilmothGroup.com with more examples of Wear and Tear versus Damages.

What Happens To The Security Deposit When Changing Property Managers?

Wednesday, July 7th, 2010

Recently, one of our owners lost their investment property (that we were managing) to foreclosure.  In the new day we currently live in, this change in ownership (from individual to bank) will mean little to the tenant.  Unlike just two years ago, the banks are honoring leases under the Protecting Tenants In Foreclosure law passed in 2009. 

Where a bank is not traditionally handling property management, they have had to go out and find companies to handle this task for them.  Unfortunately, the banks have chosen to handle tenants and management the same way they handle property services…wholesale.  The banks are hiring large companies to serve the property management function.  These “wholesalers” are providing nothing more than a back room and a local person with little or no property management experience.  Without going into too much more depth as to the ramifications of this approach, having an inexperienced field person working the transition of a property to a new manager created some issues when it came to the handling of the security deposit.

This issue is relevant to both a tenant and owner.  We hold every dollar of deposits in state regulated escrow accounts.  This money belongs to the tenant unless they violate their lease in a way that creates a need to reimburse the owner.  So, just because Wells Fargo is knocking at the door demanding we hand over the security deposit, we don’t just write a check.

Likewise, if you, as an owner, are transferring property managers, we expect all parties to handle their fiduciary responsibilities as to the security deposit in a manner that honors the tenant’s interests.  Tenants have the right to be made aware that a property manager is changing.  The correct way to handle a change in managers is to:

Utilize a letter explaining the transition.  This letter should be generated by the new property manager and ideally also signed by the owner and tenant.

Issue a check for the security deposit to both the tenant and the new property manager. 

We will usually take this check to the tenant for endorsement with the letter.  In this way we are able to introduce ourselves as the new manager, answer any questions, and have a written record of receipt of the transfer letter and endorsement of the security deposit funds into our escrow account.

Needless to say, the field person hired by the wholesale property management company hired by the bank had no connection to any procedures like this.  Basically, stating that they had the full power of the US government supporting their actions, they insisted that we hand over our lease and write them a check for the security deposit.  The resulting conflict took a few days and a call with the wholesale property manager.  We gave them a check made payable to the wholesale manager and the tenant.  I wonder what happened after that?